RobsObs mentioned that we had a mini Tank issue with Lefotu (a guy on the practice squad who had an isolated incident). How did the 'Skins take care of it? They cut him. Does that satisfy you, RobsObs?
Then why did you bring it up? You were critical of Taylor and the 'Skins when he had his incident a few years ago. You brought up Lefotu and seemed to wonder how the 'Skins would handle it. Again, you seemed to be the one that cared.
Go ahead and ask. This is an open forum for us to share our thoughts. I just find it funny that you tried to compare Lefotu's situation to Thug's.
You knock the 'Skins SO much but seems like you should give them credit for acting swiftly and justly with the Lefotu situation. Of course, you could never pay the 'Skins the slightest compliment so I won't hold my breath for that.
"Just wondering - but it looks like you have a mini-Tank problem." How is that not equating Kili with Tank? You are saying that we have a "Tank" situation.
I am fine with the question either way (with or without the Tank reference).
However, the question was asked out of the blue. The discussion was revolving around Arch Deluxe and the issues he (and the Bear defense) is having but suddenly you want to shift it to Lefotu. Why? Who cares about Lefotu? I don't mind you asking the question but it just came out randomly and seemed like there was something more to it.
Would you not commend the Redskins for taking swift and just action with Lefotu?
I just wanted your take - that is why I asked the question.
Why should I commend them? I don't know anything about the situation.
I didn't think the Bears needed to cut Tank after his incident last year where you dubbed him a thug (I did think they left him no choice with his last incident), so why would I care if the Redskins cut a guy this year?
8 comments:
I couldn't care less one way or another.
Then why did you bring it up? You were critical of Taylor and the 'Skins when he had his incident a few years ago. You brought up Lefotu and seemed to wonder how the 'Skins would handle it. Again, you seemed to be the one that cared.
I was just asking. Next time I won't ask what you think.
Go ahead and ask. This is an open forum for us to share our thoughts. I just find it funny that you tried to compare Lefotu's situation to Thug's.
You knock the 'Skins SO much but seems like you should give them credit for acting swiftly and justly with the Lefotu situation. Of course, you could never pay the 'Skins the slightest compliment so I won't hold my breath for that.
After asking what you thought about Kili and whether you wanted him cut from the team, I wrote:
"Just wondering - but it looks like you have a mini-Tank problem."
If I had just said, "Just wondering" and left off the last part, would you have been OK with that? I'm just curious.
I certainly did not equate Kili with Tank in my question to you.
"Just wondering - but it looks like you have a mini-Tank problem." How is that not equating Kili with Tank? You are saying that we have a "Tank" situation.
I am fine with the question either way (with or without the Tank reference).
However, the question was asked out of the blue. The discussion was revolving around Arch Deluxe and the issues he (and the Bear defense) is having but suddenly you want to shift it to Lefotu. Why? Who cares about Lefotu? I don't mind you asking the question but it just came out randomly and seemed like there was something more to it.
Would you not commend the Redskins for taking swift and just action with Lefotu?
I just wanted your take - that is why I asked the question.
Why should I commend them? I don't know anything about the situation.
I didn't think the Bears needed to cut Tank after his incident last year where you dubbed him a thug (I did think they left him no choice with his last incident), so why would I care if the Redskins cut a guy this year?
Fine. We will leave it at that. We have spent far too much time talking about former practice squad player Kili Lefotu.
Post a Comment