Haugh's latest article on the Turners (Ron and Norv).
A nice piece commending the two brothers. It notest the differences between the two but all in all it is very complimentary. Bottom line, it is far from Bear bashing.
I don't care that much. YOU are the one who has been HIGHLY critical of Haugh. You have said, "He only writes about the Bears as near as I can tell and easily more than 75% of what he writes is negative."
YOU have wanted me to prove to you that he doesn't just bash the Bears. Well, that is what I am doing. I have showed you that his last several articles are far from Bear bashing.
Go look at your own blog site and what you wrote about him. You even had a blog title "Another Day Another Haugh Bear-Bash."
You didn't even know what Haugh's job description was. You confused yourself.
Again, YOU asked me to provide you with articles that were not negative. I researched and provided them for you. You said that wasn't good enough. So now I am showing you first hand that he doesn't just bash the Bears in every piece he writes.
You even said that you would post up times when he wasn't negative.
You have been wrong about Haugh in every way.
I am not a Haugh fan. I am just responding to your requests and proving that you are wrong.
What I love is now that it is apparent that you have been wrong all along you say, "Why do you care so much?"
I haven't changed my mind on Haugh. In my opinion, he is overly negative when he is talking about he Bears. I laid out my criticisms about the specific stories I read before - no need to rehash all of that.
This article is not about the Bears. It is an interest piece on the Turners.
8 comments:
I'll have to read it and will get back to you. Are you the president of David Haugh's fan club? Why do you care so much?
Yeah, I read it. Good piece. I liked it because it is based on facts and not speculation. It helps to better understand something about the Bears.
Good job David Haugh! Are you happy, El Presidente (de la David Haugh fan club)?
I don't care that much. YOU are the one who has been HIGHLY critical of Haugh. You have said, "He only writes about the Bears as near as I can tell and easily more than 75% of what he writes is negative."
YOU have wanted me to prove to you that he doesn't just bash the Bears. Well, that is what I am doing. I have showed you that his last several articles are far from Bear bashing.
Go look at your own blog site and what you wrote about him. You even had a blog title "Another Day Another Haugh Bear-Bash."
You didn't even know what Haugh's job description was. You confused yourself.
Again, YOU asked me to provide you with articles that were not negative. I researched and provided them for you. You said that wasn't good enough. So now I am showing you first hand that he doesn't just bash the Bears in every piece he writes.
You even said that you would post up times when he wasn't negative.
You have been wrong about Haugh in every way.
I am not a Haugh fan. I am just responding to your requests and proving that you are wrong.
What I love is now that it is apparent that you have been wrong all along you say, "Why do you care so much?"
You are silly.
Again, I am not a Haugh fan. I am just responding to your requests and proving that you are wrong.
I haven't changed my mind on Haugh. In my opinion, he is overly negative when he is talking about he Bears. I laid out my criticisms about the specific stories I read before - no need to rehash all of that.
This article is not about the Bears. It is an interest piece on the Turners.
So you still think that his last several articles were Bear bashing? You think that 75% of what he writes is Bear bashing?
No.
However, I pointed out articles that I think are ridiculously negative. I haven't changed my mind that the guy is overly negative.
Thank you for admitting that you were wrong.
Post a Comment